(Actions and historical facts speaking louder than Vierstra’s words)
Related facts regarding Vierstra’s involvement against me with others also reported.
These are documented, repeat documented facts which show I actually helped and supported Vierstra only to have him turn against me, try to hack my web sites, get involved with my human rights case against the Balinese police and expatriate Jack Daniels when he had no business (except nasty business) to do so and which I told him to stay out of, has been involved in illegal activities against me since and now seeks to publicly defame me.
November 2002, Bali’s corrupt police take an unlawful unsigned report against me from a competitor with a grudge after I caught them offering unauthorized and unsustainable hotel rates on the Internet (Jack Daniels) and unlawfully detained myself and confiscated my passport (unless you are charged with a crime, neither is legal). The British Embassy who rarely intervenes stated their acts were unlawful and intervened to secure my and my passport’s immediate release.
17th January 2003 I run the Bali and Lombok Travel Forum and Bert Vierstra contact me and asked for support on his new Bali expat forum; I provide several links to him.
June and July 2003 I send Vierstra two sales enquiries for his new villa real estate site (before I realized villa sales to foreigners are an unlawful fraud), one for his top end listed property. Vierstra says “I”ll kiss you, really”; I am pretty sure he meant it as an approach and without reply / saying so suspected then that he was gay.
January 2004 I send another customer to Vierstra.
April 2004 Myself, my wife and our 18 month old son have to flee our home in Thailand after armed Thai thugs come to the estate office and ask for the exact location of our home there. I am able by reference to written statements made by Jack Daniels in Bali show that he was responsible and publish these facts.
November 2004 Vierstra admits to having posted hate messages on my Bali and Lombok Travel Forum using pseudonyms.
November 2004 Vierstra discusses with other members of his expat forum, including one Roy Thompson, how to get past the security on my forum to post hate messages. Legally because both Vierstra and Thompson had been told not to use my forum what they attempted was trespass and defacement; hacking. I published this fact and so did others.
November 2004 Vierstra tells me he is going for coffee with the man who filed the unlawful police complaint against me and clearly tried to have me killed; Vierstra says he is doing this to find out the truth. I tell him not to do this as I will take these both as meddling in something very dangerous he has no business to get involved in and a sign he is supporting Daniels against me. Vierstra says “If the situation you are in is not your own fault, but a deliberate attack (for what reason?) I will go public”.
12th November 2004 Vierstra meets with Jack Daniels and is reportedly shown a copy of the police file against me (which Daniels should not have of course) including details of an Interpol Watch Order placed against me by the Balinese police showing my former home address and movements in Thailand. Of course it is plain to any idiot that I did not and still do not warrant an Interpol watch order, especially when the data from that is given to someone who stands accused of obtaining my home address in Thailand by some foul / unlawful means and sending thugs to kill me. I was still unaware of the unlawful acts by the Balinese police regarding Interpol at this time and their file on Daniels’ desk proved highly illegal and murderous acts were being committed against me. Did Bert Vierstra uphold his previous pious statement that he would make any wrong doing public? Did Bert Vierstra, the man who exudes or rather feigns self-morality let me know what was going on so I could take actions to protect myself and my family? Why no, Bert Vierstra did what he does best. He tells the world he is working for the good of Bali and humanity while lying, meddling and trying to cause other people harm. Vierstra emailed me and said “I have had some meetings with people today, heard a lot that I didn't know yet. Our conversations are over, I will not send you any mail anymore and won't reply to yours.” However Bert Vierstra clearly shows his nasty mind set as he continues to demean me on his forum. He promises to follow me around the Internet as he is not happy I published the fact he tried to hack my forum and also help others do the same. I and others describe Vierstra as a “Little Nazi”.
June 2005 I am informed about the unlawful Interpol Watch Order by my new lawyers in Jakarta who visited the Bali police.
June 2005 My London lawyers file a complaint under the data protection act (EU) with Interpol about my name being placed on their automated watch facility, and also a complaint against the Balinese police officers involved (I understand police chief Made Pastika himself signed the Interpol authorization form) under Interpol’s anti-corruption mandate. It transpires the watch order was a regional one with the Thai Police, so the 2 complaints had to also be filed regionally with Interpol’s office in Jakarta (staffed by Indonesians of course) who quickly removed the watch order but did not respond nor commence an investigation.
2007 Several times Vierstra posted that I had hacked one of his web sites, a photo site. It transpires that in fact no-one had hacked his site but that he had a problem with his web hosting company; I believe he forgot to pay them! Did Vierstra the man who admitted he tried to hack my forum apologize for calling me a hacker? No, but then look at what Vierstra says a lot of about me without substance or evidence and think of Freud.
April 2007 Vierstra’s little friend Roy Thompson of Ubud who he colluded with to hack my forums gets a scan of my passport from Jack Daniels and publishes it on the Internet. Bert Vierstra conducts an anti-Mark Austin session on his blogs and forums and posts links to this illicitly gained material on the web; my requests to have this data removed were ignored by Vierstra and his hosting company replied it was up to him. Knowing I was the subject of an unlawful Interpol watch order and that an attempt had likely been made on my life, Vierstra again shows what he alludes to be and what he actually is are two totally different and opposed things.
June 2007 Roy Thompson (Vierstra’s agent) emails me to tell me my name is going to be put on Interpol’s automated watch facility again.
July 2007 Allegations start being published that Bert Vierstra is a pedophile backed up with quite substantive evidence. Bert Vierstra then for the first time since November 2004 emails me accusing me of being responsible. Even if I were, I believe he would deserve it given his acts against me. The allegations were then also made on the Bali BS site. I have an email from the owner of Bali BS who contacted Vierstra before publishing anything giving him the chance to deny the claims and evidence which shows Vierstra is likely a pedophile and Vierstra replied quote “just publish what you think you have”. Bert Vierstra actually addressed this to me by name as he falsely contends I operate Bali BS, so Vierstra gave both myself and Bali BS permission to publish whatever we thought about him regarding his alleged pedophilia.
Bali BS went ahead and did what Vierstra had given them permission to do, but then Vierstra was not happy as the evidence included an association he had with a recently convicted pedophile plus other material which made the allegations highly credible. Bert Vierstra then starts a campaign of “proving” Bali BS is me in order to deflect attention away from himself and the question as to whether he is a pedophile. Vierstra’s “proof” purely shows I have helped which I have always admitted / stated. Veirstra also accused German Harry Bleckert of being Bali BS' owner at one point.
August 10th 2007 Vierstra then contacts me and ask me to help him. Vierstra said that he had already removed certain defamatory material he published about me as a conciliatory gesture and asked if a) I would remove the page about him here on this blog site and b) ask another blogger to do the same on his site. I told him I really did not care what he had published about me at that point but agreed anyway as a sign of good faith and possible mediation. I kept to my word, Vierstra did not. After I had removed the page (without back-up) he reinstated the page(s) on me he had deleted and which he kept a back up of; hmmm, if he kept a back-up is it not clear Vierstra intended to publish them again? I emailed the other blogger but he refused to remove his blog about Vierstra likely being a pedophile.
When I looked at Vierstra’s site, not only had he reinstated the defamatory page he had said he had permanently removed and without saying anything to me (of course), but he had also published a whole host of new anti-Mark garbage, including a picture of me made into the likeness of a pig. I actually got a good laugh out of it and my Balinese wife has sent it to her family in Bali so they can have a good laugh too, but Bert Vierstra’s act was not designed to amuse me for sure. The file name used by Vierstra is "austinpignose.jpg" and if this is not Internet defamation, then I do not know what is.
Bert also posted this picture of a cat and claimed it was of me; note the remark about lawyers as this will become quite poignant shortly. Basically he is calling me a "scaredy cat" who calls for his lawyers whenever anyone says anything bad about me, in reference to my court case against his friend Jack Daniels, which Viersta and his forum buddies claim was a victory for freedom of speech (my lawyer in the USA missed a filing deadline by 2 days so my case against Daniels was struck out on a technicality).I believe Vierstra has made around 50 hate blogs against me to date, all of the same "quality" and "standard". Bert Vierstra also let it slip in his tirade of published hate against me that he had gone to the Balinese police in Lovina at the very same time as having made a so-called conciliatory gesture to and false agreement with me, to “file a report” with them about me, claiming I was the owner of Bali BS and other sites and had committed criminal libel against him. Funny how Bert Vierstra likes to dish it out but does not like anyone saying anything bad about him! However, while telling the police with his concocted and often falsified “evidence” that I was the owner of Bali BS, he admitted to his little expatriate friends online that he was sure I did not own Bali BS, only that I supported them. So Bert went to the police to tell them he had evidence I was the owner of Bali BS while admitting to others he knew I was not; Something about making a falsified police complaint?
So on to Bert’s complaint to the police of criminal libel by me against him. Criminal libel in Indonesia involves a law that was introduced to stop Indonesians with less power and influence saying anything possibly damaging about an Indonesian with more power and influence than them, even when this is true and in the public’s best interest. Forgetting the fact that the law clearly states it is for Indonesians and people within Indonesia, so putting anything I say about Bert outside their jurisdiction, the basis of Indonesian criminal libel is that one person has to get the express permission of another person they wish to make a potentially damaging statement about! Criminal libel is Indonesia’s most abused law for this reason as it prevents anyone telling the truth about someone more powerful unless they agree to it! It is why reporting corrupt police officers to the Indonesian Corruption Commission without getting police approval first gives them the “right” to arrest you for criminal libel against the police! Thing is, Bert gave me and others permission to say what we thought, so I can not have libeled him by any legal definition, even in the corrupt judicial land of Indonesia.
Unfortunately for Bert his Balinese police complaint against me backfired as I understand he was told to remove all the Mark Austin and Bali BS nonsense off his “blog” site by them on the basis is was promoting interest in Bali BS and me to the detriment of Bali and Indonesia. Bert must have spent days writing all the garbage and researching all the half facts he did, such as the fact I once published a book and had been involved in weight loss web sites. Bert and his forum friends calling me a "freak" derided my book which was about the possibility of an afterlife thanks to quantum mechanics. Bert went on to publish false claims that my charitable site was a fraud, that I did not actually give money to charity; how's that for libel? What made it worse is that Bert deliberately targeted my charitable site on the internet to show up in search engine returns and thus affect the money my site earned for children's charities; how's that for nasty? Bert Vierstra basically called me a criminal for having been involved in online medications even though I had already informed him that I actually sought legal advice and even contacted the US FDA at one point and was never informed that anything I was doing was remotely criminal, yet Bert still described me as one. Plus Bert went on to show just how flawed all his so-called investigations and proof are against me by claiming I was into jewelry on the Internet as a business; not me thank you. It is clear Bert spent months worth of time on his false quest to defame me on the Internet and being made to remove all his sad work clearly did not go down well with Bert as this is when he decided to take his quest against me to Portugal!
Bert has been pulling a few favours with one of his little Dutch chums to try and harass me in Portugal, with threatening text messages to my mobile, with an email saying he would come to Portugal to deal with me face to face (any day Bert, just make sure it is face to face and you call me first to avoid any misunderstandings) and to threaten me with libel proceedings in Portugal and the EU. Vierstra has even "appointed" his Dutch friend's "lawyer" in Lisbon, one Luís Carvalho Neves, whose advogado association fax contact number indicates he is registered solely for general legal advice (counsel) within his position as Secretary General for the Portuguese Association of Vending Machines! So this is what Bert meant about dispensing justice! No matter what lawyer Vierstra goes crying like a little scaredy cat to though, Bert has that one major legal technical hurdle to overcome; he gave both me and Bali BS permission to publish what we wanted! So as for suing me in Portugal and the EU; oh, OK! Perhaps Bert is on coke.
The above are documented facts, not seeming pure rhetoric as with Vierstra. I believe the cold light of day shows that Vierstra is gay and therefore lives in Bali unlawfully courtesy of a sham marriage and that he exhibits severe psychological (mental) problems which I believe are typical of a pedophile. As the saying goes, especially when he gave me permission to say it “If the pedophile cap fits Vierstra, you must be a pedophile”.
Have a nice day.
0 comments:
Post a Comment